Friday, October 6, 2017

Rhetorical Analysis Pt. 2

           
             Kyle Koster author of Is Cam Newton Just Not Going to Apologize, an article written after Cam Newton gave a sexist comment in a press conference after the game this past Sunday.  One of the main reporters for the Carolina Panthers, Jourdan Rodrigue, asked Cam a question about the routes during the football game.  Newton responded with, “I think it’s funny when girls talk about routes like… it’s just funny” causing huge backlash nationwide.  Koster was very opinionated on the situation and expressed it greatly throughout the article, he used his opinion in the perfect way to persuade the audience.
            In the first parts of the article the author already began to express his opinion on how he believes Newtons remark was extremely sexists and was angry with the fact that he did not apologize.  It was as if newton made the comment to Koster himself instead of the actual reporter.  He states “Let's look at this situation through the eyes of a bottom-line obsessed cynic. Through that lens, it's even more astounding that Newton hasn't yet apologized.”  He uses the phrase “bottom-line obsessed cynic” not everyone knows what that means, however it sounds like he wants people to look at it through the eyes of even the lowest of people and assess the situation from there.
            The affect that line had on the audience had to be huge, by saying that even a person whom has the lowest standards would still believe that it is absurd that Newton hasn’t apologized.  With this beginning to the article his stance is already made clear, he believes that it is crazy how someone in that position could state something that far out and still think he could avoid apologizing.  Especially to a woman whom has worked for the Panthers for a year and a half. 
            “Given the opportunity to clear the air with [Jourdan Rodrigue] … Newton repeatedly declined to apologize or successfully de-escalate the tension.”  Koster then goes on to ask several open-ended questions regarding the Panthers and Cam Newton himself.  Using open-ended questions in the article cause readers to think and it can be a very effective persuasion method to get readers to agree with him.  For example, Koster asks “What is the end game? How can Newton and the Panthers be so oblivious to the fact that there's a cleanup here?” these questions get the mind going and asking oneself “wow he is right how can Cam come back from this?” 
            The audience at this point has to be at least somewhat persuaded into the direction the author wants, he sounds so attached to the subject that his opinions are starting to seem like facts thrown at you during a heated professional debate.  Koster doesn’t stop his opinions there, in the end he goes into how someone of that stature could attempt to fix what has happened. Yet, he states it is too late, he started to give some sympathy and it seemed as if he would help Cam in a way. Instead he says, “it's tough to fathom how Newton believes he can outrun this or wait it out … Don't hold your breath waiting for him to apologize”.
            Koster throughout the entire article continued to express his strong opinion towards Newton. It is very clear how he felt towards the situation, and he had a very good style of writing to express it, that got the audience on his side.
Link to article:
https://a.msn.com/r/2/AAsWTAn?m=en-u

No comments:

Post a Comment